Pigeon Christine Phd

Pigeon Christine Phd
Pigeon Christine Phd 5625 College Avenue Oakland, CA 94618
Add a Review

Consumer Feedback

(3 Reviews)
Takes the side of the troublemaker and makes the non-troublemaker pay for it so she can put herself in the position of not having to think but still getting paid for her bad decisions as a "special master.". Not recommended.
by CLC xxx.xxx.102.233
July 31, 2022
I AGREE TO RUN DON'T WALK AWAY FROM HER. SHE IS HEARTLESS AND COLD. SHE HAS NO CONSIDERATION FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF ANYONE BUT HER OWN JUDGMENTS. I DON'T THINK SHE HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS OF BEING A NEUTRAL AT ALL. SHE IS TOTALLY BIASED AND ONE SIDED BECAUSE OF HER OWN PREJUDICES ABOUT WHAT SHE BELIEVES.
by Mom2x xxx.xxx.164.150
September 15, 2015
Run don't walk away from this very, very unprofessional, corrupt, seriously dangerous person who messed up the life of my daughter and I for many years. Counselors are supposed to help people, not hurt them -- but she was a court-appointed "reunification facilitator" who in her own words, didn't believe I should be reunified with my daughter, who I had had joint legal and 50/50 physical custody of! Instead of bowing out, (I believe she didn't believe that fathers should have equal parenting rights as mothers) she did everything she could to sabotage our reunification. In fact, when I told her she was a corrupt and evil professional, instead of calmly asking me exactly how she was corrupt and evil, she freaked out because she knew "the shoe fit" and threw me out of her office. I have many hours of recorded answering machine messages and paperwork to back all this up. One of these days, I might go to Sacramento with this incontrovertible, court-admissable evidence to testify that she should lose her license but I have better things to do now. My fight to get my custody restored took 14 years but finally I got my daughter back when she was 17 and we have a great relationship! This woman is seriously an unwell person like one of the other reviewers alluded to, especially in terms of custody for fathers.
by LovingDad xxx.xxx.181.49
November 25, 2012
Add a Review